Kemi Adeosun
The
Federal Government has given details of some of the foreign loans it
has raised in the last two years and how they were expended.
According
to an exclusive reprt by The Punch, the Federal Government obtained
about $4.8bn from various foreign sources in the last two years. The
loans were expended on various programmes.
The
Economic Governance, Diversification and Competitiveness Support
Programme was the highest single financing item on which the government
expended $600m of the borrowed funds from external sources in the last
two years.
Responding
to an enquiry from The Punch under the Freedom of Information Act, the
Federal Government, through the Debt Management Office, said it received
$600m from the African Development Bank for the EGDCSP.
The
AfDB said on its website that the programme would help the government
to create the fiscal space to facilitate a smooth implementation of the
government’s budget, support fiscal and structural reforms, and improve
the targeting of social sector spending to protect the most vulnerable
segments of the population.
While
the first tranche of the programme costing $600m was approved in 2016,
the second tranche costing $400m is expected to be approved this year to
take the total value of the loan to $1bn.
Another
major loan of $500m came from the International Bank for Reconstruction
and Development for Nigeria’s development finance institutions. The
item also attracted $400m from the AfDB in addition to another $400m
secured from the African Development Fund.
The
Federal Government secured $500m from the International Development
Association, an arm of the World Bank, for the Saving One Million Lives,
which is a scheme to expand access to essential primary health care
services for women and children.
Three
states, Rivers, Ogun and Lagos, benefitted from the foreign debts
secured in the last two years. The Federal Government secured UA3.3m
($5.06m) and $200m for the Urban Water Sector Reform and Port Harcourt
Water Supply and Sanitation projects, and $33.17m for the Ogun State
Urban Water Supply Project.
It also obtained $100m from the AFD for the Lagos Integrated Urban Development Project.
From
the International Development Association, the Federal Government
secured $200m, $70m, $140m and $70m for the Polio Eradication Support
Project, Higher Education Centres of Excellence Project, Community and
Social Development Project, and African Higher Education Centre of
Excellence Project, respectively.
Another
$140m was obtained from the World Bank for the Community and Social
Development Project. The Polio Eradication Support Project received
another $200m from the IDA, while the Nigerian Partnership for Education
Project also received $100m from the same organisation.
From
the Export-Import Bank of China, the Federal Government obtained $325m
for 40 plants under the Parboiled Rice Processing Plant Project; and
$280m from the AfDB for the Enable Youth Nigeria Programme.
Also
from the AfDB, the Federal Government obtained $250m for the Inclusive
Basic Service Delivery and Livelihood Empowerment Integrated Programme.
From
the IDA, the government also obtained $200m for the Multi-Sectorial
Crisis Recovery Project for North Eastern Nigeria and $90m for the
Regional Surveillance Systems Enhancement.
The
government’s response to The Punch's enquiry, which was directed to the
Minister of Finance, Mrs. Kemi Adeosun, did not indicate how far it had
gone in implementing the projects for which it obtained the foreign
loans in the last two years of the current administration.
Experts
have at various times expressed fears that governments across the
country borrow funds that are not tied to projects but to finance
routine expenditure such as salaries and overheads.
While this may be true of local debts, foreign agencies hardly lend without knowing what the funds will be utilised for.
The
response of the Federal Government to Punch’s enquiry showed that local
debts were not tied to any specific projects but warehoused in the
Central Bank of Nigeria for financing budget deficits.
Some
stakeholders say the government should only borrow to finance capital
projects and infrastructure that have the capacity to generate funds for
both debt servicing and repayment of the principal.
This is hardly the case as most of the debts are spent on programmes and routine expenses.
No comments:
Post a Comment